SMB does not allow the user to do the editing of files located in a remote location or different system. NFS uses TCP/IP protocol, whereas SMB uses only TCP protocol.Mostly NFS runs on any version protocol depending on the type of protocol used in file sharing. The client user support in SMB is high when compared to NFS.Īlso, both SMB and NFS have security concerns over the files and take good care of the security.This is due to the weak security of NFS during the developed days. Nowadays the security is far developed, and it is comparable with SMB. NFS is more popular with server clients, and CMB is more popular with user clients.The table below summarizes the comparisons between NFS vs SMB : This happens due to the protocols used by both of the sharing protocols.

The file-sharing protocol of Unix or Linux. NFS is used for server to server file sharing and is mostly a server-client file-sharing protocol. SMB is used for the transfer of files from the places the user needs and is mostly a user client file-sharing protocol. NFS requires AppleDouble files to share Apple extended documents. SMB supports Apple extended documents, and no additional files are required. No remote server administration app is used in NFS. The remote server administration app is used in either Mac or Win. NFS does not support ACL files to be transferred or shared within the networks or systems. MOUNT MAC NFS SHARE WINDOWS 10 SOFTWARE.

Mac nfs share